* 搜尋
* 核能資訊中心
* 中心簡介
* 日本福島核災專區
* 相關資訊
國際核能現況 : NEI calls for reform to design certification process
發表人 nicenter 於 2017/10/18 14:17:27 (20 人讀取)

The Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI) has called on US regulators to reform its reactor design certification process by removing an extra tier of information designations it describes as unnecessarily burdensome. The NEI says five years of experience at US construction projects have shown Tier 2* designations reduce flexibility while imposing additional burdens and complexity on both licensee and regulator, without adding any safety benefit.

The Washington, DC-based organisation has submitted a 32-page letter to US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) chairman Kristine Svinicki in which it calls for elimination of Tier 2* designations in the design certification process. The letter, signed by NEI vice president and acting chief nuclear officer Joseph Pollock, follows an initial recommendation to eliminate the designation made by the NEI to the NRC in 2014.

The NRC's process for the certification and construction of new reactors, under regulation 10 CFR Part 52, was introduced in 1989. The regulator subsequently approved the use of two tiers of design-related information and established separate procedures for signing off on any changes to that information, depending on the safety relevance of the changes.

Vogtle 3's second steam generator was lifted into place on 10 October. Experience at the AP1000 project has demonstrated the additional burden imposed by Tier 2*, NEI says. (Image: Georgia Power)

Tier 1 information is considered to be more safety-relevant, with any changes requiring prior approval from the NRC. Changes to Tier 2 information can be made without prior NRC approval, provided that safety-focused criteria are met, in a similar process to the "50.59-like" process that is used in the operating nuclear fleet.

Tier 2* was introduced into the design certification process in the early 1990s, with the intention of minimising the scope of Tier 1 information. Like Tier 1 information, any design certification information with a Tier 2* designation requires prior NRC approval via a licence amendment for any changes, regardless of the safety significance of the change. Unlike Tier 1 information, changes to Tier 2* information do not require an exemption to the existing design certification.

Tier 2* should, in theory, have provided greater flexibility in making changes to information but in practice the level of effort required for changes to Tier 1 and Tier 2* information is nearly identical, NEI said.

Experience over the past five years at two AP1000 construction projects - Summer units 2 and 3 and Vogtle units 3 and 4 - has demonstrated the additional burden and additional costs imposed because of the Tier 2* designation as well as the potential that "emergent Tier 2* issues" could cause "needless" construction delays, the letter notes.

"An updated assessment of Tier 2* experience has shown that approximately 30% of licence amendment requests were required solely because of changes to Tier 2* information. Of those changes, approximately 90% would not have required an amendment if a '50.59-like' change process could be applied," Pollock said. The remainder would have required a licence amendment under the 50.59-like process in any case, so the Tier 2* designation was "duplicative and unnecessary", he said.

"Elimination of Tier 2* is a step that can and should be taken today to immediately benefit design certification applicants and to demonstrate timely, effective response to regulatory lessons learned," Pollock told the NRC.

Of the USA's two A1000 projects only Southern Company's Vogtle 3 and 4, in Georgia, remain under construction. Pollock urged the NRC to act "expeditiously" with Southern Company to identify the most timely and efficient course to relieve the project of "the continued unnecessary burden of Tier 2*".

David Jones, vice president of technical compliance at Southern Company subsidiary Georgia Power, said the company supported the NEI's effort to remove Tier 2* from future design certification applications. Near-term relief from the Tier 2* change process for Vogtle 3 and 4 would improve industry and regulator focus on "those aspects of construction which are truly safety-significant" without compromising NRC oversight, he said.

Researched and written
by World Nuclear News


2017/11/22 15:28:16 - 環境輻射監測正常,歐洲放射性釕-106並未影響台灣
2017/11/22 15:26:22 - Quality assurance issues affect French and Swiss plants
2017/11/22 14:06:12 - US conversion plant suspends UF6 production
2017/11/17 15:59:03 - IAEA sees continuous improvement in safety at Borssele
2017/11/17 14:17:40 - US test reactor resumes operations
2017/11/17 14:15:44 - Regulators start technical assessment of UK HPR 1000
2017/11/15 14:26:06 - China’s Nuclear Capacity Continues To Rise As It ‘Shapes Global Energy Trends’
2017/11/15 14:23:44 - China and Vietnam to cooperate on nuclear safety
2017/11/15 14:21:56 - Second licence renewal for Virginia units
2017/11/15 14:20:24 - IAEA concludes Belgian research reactor safety review
2017/11/15 14:18:28 - http://www.world-nuclear-news.org/EE-IEA-notes-nuclears-role-in-meeting-sustainability-goals-1411174.html
2017/11/10 14:36:20 - FANR: Globalisation key to regulatory excellence
2017/11/10 14:27:58 - Cameco to suspend McArthur River and Key Lake
2017/11/10 14:25:39 - Integrated Molten Salt Reactor passes pre-licensing milestone
2017/11/10 14:23:03 - Rolls-Royce to conduct SMR study for Jordan
2017/11/8 9:42:27 - 核三廠1號機預定於11月5日降載運轉,原能會持續監控電廠運轉安全
2017/11/8 9:41:01 - Bulgaria Extends Kozloduy-5 Operating Licence By 10 Years
2017/11/8 9:39:36 - Rooppur 1 receives construction licence
2017/11/8 9:36:52 - Bulgaria issues Kozloduy 5 licence extension
2017/11/8 9:32:06 - UN report identifies emissions gap


今天: 6
昨天: 111
本月: 1985
總計: 505227

30013 新竹市光復路二段101號 創新育成中心三樓309室 電話:(03)571-1808 傳真:(03)572-5461 Email: nicenter@nicenter.org.tw